<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being 100% rational&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/</link>
	<description>Notes on the web, music and other random bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/comment-page-1/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>Ah, so I was &quot;irrational&quot;. Which quite nicely highlights one fundamental problem with the strict neo-classical view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so I was &#8220;irrational&#8221;. Which quite nicely highlights one fundamental problem with the strict neo-classical view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/comment-page-1/#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/#comment-6415</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see that my rudimentary view of economics still holds then. I had no problem going to the buy now with a, admittedly ridiculous, price of Â£.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see that my rudimentary view of economics still holds then. I had no problem going to the buy now with a, admittedly ridiculous, price of Â£.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/comment-page-1/#comment-6405</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/#comment-6405</guid>
		<description>Well, rational as in the neo-classical economics meaning of the word. Which, really, is said with a sprinkle of irony... (I read somewhere you can&#039;t pay less than Â£1.00, or can you? In which case Â£.1 is exactly 10 times more rational...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, rational as in the neo-classical economics meaning of the word. Which, really, is said with a sprinkle of irony&#8230; (I read somewhere you can&#8217;t pay less than Â£1.00, or can you? In which case Â£.1 is exactly 10 times more rational&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/comment-page-1/#comment-6404</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eric.wahlforss.com/2007/10/09/being-100-rational/#comment-6404</guid>
		<description>Why is Â£1 more rational than Â£.1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Â£1 more rational than Â£.1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

